SHAH JADE Vs. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL I AT ALLAHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard Sri Siddharth Counsel for the petitioner, Sri P. K. Mukherjee and standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed as labourer on 25. 6. 1982 in the respondent M/s Jeep Industrial Ltd. Allahabad.

(3.) IN their rejoinder affidavit, the employers case the labour Court was that the petitioner workman was only a temporary employee, he was engaged from time to time on need basis and he has never worked corftinuously in the establishment for more than 240 days in any of the year of his engagement. It was denied by the respondents employers that any junior to the workman concerned had been retained in service and that the workman was paid all his dues and amount in lieu of notice according to the provisions as contained in the certified standing order of the Company; that they have not indulged in any unfair labour practice or have given any artificial break in the service of the workman as alleged by him.