TEJ PAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BARKAT Ali Zaidi, J. The applicants filed a Criminal Revision before the Sessions Judge, Aligarh. Since it was filed beyond time, an application (Criminal Misc. No. 19 of 1993) under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was also given which was allowed by the Sessions Court (Additional Sessions Judge Court No IX), on payment of Rs. Two hundred as costs to be paid within three days. Since the costs was not paid within time, the Court dismissed the Revision.

(2.) THE applicants have now come to this Court under Section 482, Cr. P. C. seeking to set aside the order of dismissal of revision.

(3.) WITH these observations, this petition is dismissed. Petition dismissed. .