VIJAY PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS writ petition challenges the compulsory retirement of the petitioner. It appears from the order dated 26-10-2006 passed in this writ petition that the Bench hearing this matter was not satisfied with the material disclosed by the respondents to justify the compulsory retirement and accordingly by that order it was directed that the respondents should produce the entire records including service book of the petitioner in original. The service book as well as the proceedings of the Screening Committee have been produced in original before us today.

(3.) IN the circumstances, the writ petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed.