NAJIR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VINOD Prasad, J. List is revised. Learned Counsel for the applicants is not present.

(2.) THE whole family consisting of husband, mother-in-law, father-in-law, three Nanands (sister-in-laws) and three Dewars (brother-in-laws) have approached this Court with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 3. 5. 2007 passed by Additional Civil Judge (JD)/judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4 Moradabad in Complaint Case No. 5444/9/06 Gulebasana v. Najir and others under section 498-A IPC, P. S. Munda Pandey, district Moradabad. As the issue was 'between the husband and wife and the close relatives, the matter was placed before the reconciliation Centre by this Court vide order dated 12. 6. 2007. THE report of the Conciliator as well as Bench Secretary, Allahabad High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre clearly indicate that settlement could not be reached and hen

(3.) WITH the help of the learned Counsels for the respondents, I have perused the complaint (annexure No. 2) to the affidavit filed in support of this application as well as the copy of the application under section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. filed by Smt. Gu-lawsana. I have also perused the statement under section 200 Cr. P. C. as well as the statement of P. W. 1 Mehrub w/o Aslam and mother of Gulawsana and that of Ikrar Husain P. W. 2 the eyewitness.