MILAN KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application, under section 482, Cr. P. C. has been filed by the applicants, who have been called by vth Metropolitan Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar vide order dated 21-5-2007, in Criminal Case No. 2262 of 2007, under Sections 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 22 of Protection of Women from domestic Violence'act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to show cause within specified time, why action should not be taken against them on the complaint of opposite party No. 2, smt. Swapnil Singh. The applicants have prayed for quashing and stay of proceedings of said complaint.

(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicants and learned A. G. A.

(3.) IT appears from the record that the opposite party No. 2 has been married with applicant No. 1. The applicant No. 2 is the father-in-law of opposite party No. 2. Some matrimonial disputes are going on between the parties and beside this complaint, some other criminal proceedings are also going on. Learned counsel for the applicants has placed before me a few legal points. According to him, there is no compliance of Rule 6 of the Protection of Women from Domestic violence Rules, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules ). According to these Rules, the complaint must be filed in Form II given in the Rules. He has argued that without compliance of Rule 6, the complaint cannot be entertained by the Magistrate. Rule 6 of the said Rules is qyoted below: