ANAND KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, the Standing counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioner possesses I.T.I. diploma in Mechanical Diesel from State Institute of Training Board, Madhya Pradesh in 1986. He was appointed as cleaner in the UPSRTC in 1989 and was thereafter promoted to the post of Fitter in 1994 and since then he is continuously working on the said post at Regional Work-shop, Jhunsi.

(3.) THE counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents authorities have adopted pick and choose policy in promoting the concerned employees of their choice as respondent nos. 4,5 and 6 have been declared successful even though they are not I.T.I. qualified in any trade of automobile.