RAVINDRA KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -Heard counsels for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THE petitioner claims that he was selected by the Selection Committee for appointment to the post of Sanitary Inspector in the Notified Area Committee, Muni-ki-Reti, district Tehri Garhwal (now falls in the State of Uttara Khand). Accordingly, he was appointed on daily wage basis vide order of appointment dated 1.6.1987. He joined at Tehri Garhwal as Sanitary Inspector on daily wage basis w.e.f. 3.6.1987. He worked as such till 31.10.1988. THEreafter he was appointed on ad hoc basis as Sanitary Inspector at Dadri, district Ghaziabad vide order dated 1.11.1988. THE petitioner claims that he has been working as such till date on ad hoc basis.

(3.) COUNSEL for the petitioner contended that the appointment of the petitioner, on ad hoc basis, was approved by Director of Local Bodies, who is appointing authority of Sanitary Inspector, as such, petitioner ought to have continued on the post of Sanitary Inspector and the impugned orders are liable to be quashed.