JITENDRA Vs. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner, aggrieved by the judgment dated 21. 8. 2007 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad in Original Application No. 464 of 2005, has filed this writ petition seeking writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 31. 3. 1999 and a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider his claim regarding compassionate appointment.

(2.) HEARD Shri Sharad Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Ashok Nigam, learned Additional Solicitor General of India assisted by Shri Rajeshwar Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents and also perused the record.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Tribunal has not correctly dealt with his matter. We do not find any force in the submission for the reason that, admittedly, his case was considered by the authority and it was found that the petitioner after the death of his father married himself and is maintaining his family. Further, where a large number of other cases are pending deserving compassionate appointment, persons, having lesser necessity, cannot be allowed to give compassionate appointment.