RAJ KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) VIJAY Kumar Verma, J.- Since similar question of law is involved, hence all these cases are being decided by this common judgment.

(2.) APPLICATIONS under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr. P. C. for short) have been moved in these cases with the prayer that the Court below be directed to release the applicants on bail on the same bail bonds as have already been furnished by them.

(3.) IT was contended by the learned Counsel for the applicants that bail in the cases has already been granted by the Magistrate concerned and in pursuance of the bail orders, the applicants have been released, but since new Sections have been added in the charge-sheet, hence the applicants should be permitted to continue, on the same bail bonds and it is not necessary for them to surrender themselves before, the Court below. IT was further submitted by the learned Counsel for the applicants that direction can be issued by this Court to the Court below either to permit the applicants to continue on the same bail bonds or to accept fresh bail bonds. For these submissions, reliance has been placed on the case of Movin Ahmad v. Ist Additional Judicial Magistrate, Pratapgarh, 2001 (2) JIC 452 (All) (LB) : 2001 (43) ACC 1061, and orders dated 5-1-2007 and 1-5-2007 passed by Hon'ble V. K. Chaturvedi, J. in Criminal Misc. Application No. 151 of 2007 and by Hon'ble K. K. Misra, J. in Criminal Misc. Application No. 8813 of 2007 respectively.