(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.
(2.) THIS appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 7.11.2006 passed by the first appellate court whereby it has allowed the respondent -plaintiffs appeal and has decreed the suit for permanent injunction.
(3.) THE trial court on the pleadings of the parties framed several issues and while giving its findings held that the property in question is not proved to be a property belonging to the plaintiff and that it is a land alloted for construction of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial. The trial court also did not find the possession of the plaintiff over the disputed land. Accordingly, it dismissed the suit.