TULSI Vs. DOODH NATH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri H. C. Saxena and Sri O. P. Pandey, learned counsels for the appellant and Sri A. K. Mishra advocate, for the contesting respondents.

(2.) THIS is plaintiffs second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31. 8. 1995, passed by the Additional District Judge, Varanasi, Mahrajganj in Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1994 confirming the judgment and decree dated 15. 12. 1993, passed by Munsif Magistrate, Farenda, district Maharajganj in Original Suit No. 280 of 1991.

(3.) IN the circumstances, the short question involved in the present second appeal is, whether the suit was barred or not. Learned counsel for the appellant has placed the plaint before me in support of this contention that the suit was simplicitor for relief of injunction and, therefore, this relief could not be given by the revenue courts and the suit was maintainable.