REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Sanjay Agrwal Appellant

V/S

STATE OF UP Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

UNION OF INDIA V. PARAMESHWARAN MATCH WORKS [REFERRED]
SYED KHALID RIZVI V. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED]
AKHILESH KUMAR MISRA AND ORS. V. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AND ORS. [REFERRED]
UNION OF INDIA V. SUDHIR KUMAR JAISWAL [REFERRED]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. VISHNU RAMCHANDRA [REFERRED]
CHANDRA MOHAN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED]
WORKMEN OF FIRESTONE TYRE RUBBER CO OF INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED DR GENERAL MANAGER LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED MANAGER LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED BOMBAY GODFREY PHILLIPS INDIA LIMITED VS. MANAGEMENT:SHEIKH ISMAIL MOHAMED:K P GANGHARE:MANIK VASUDEO [REFERRED]
A PANDURANGA RAO VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED]
SATYA NARATN SINGH NARESHCHANDRADUBEY RAVINDRA NATH VERMA VS. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD:HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD:HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD [REFERRED]
A P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION HYDERABAD VS. B SARAT CHANDRA [REFERRED]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. RAMJEE PRASAD [REFERRED]
K J JOHN ASSTT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR GRADE I PALAI UTTAR PRADESH ASSTT PUBLIC PROSECUTORS ASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED]
NARAINDAS JAIN VS. AGRA NAGAR MAHAPALIKA AGRA [REFERRED]
D C BHATIA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED]
UNION OF INDIA VS. VIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL SHAH [REFERRED]
ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA OTHERS VS. CHANDER SHEKHAR ANOTHER [REFERRED]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. RAI CHAND JAIN [REFERRED]
SUSHMA SURI REETA DUTTA JIT RAM KASANA GURU ADHIN DEEPAK KUMAR AGRAWAL MAHESH CHANDER VERMA RANBIR SINGH VS. GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI [REFERRED]
STATE OF BIHAR VS. BAL MUKUND SAH [REFERRED]
SATISH KUMAR SHARMA VS. BAR COUNCIL OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [REFERRED]
KANT TRIPATHI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED]
PARMESHWAR BABU PRASHAD VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED]
ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED]
CHANDRA PRAKASH TIWARI VS. SHAKUNTALA SHUKLA [REFERRED]
SHANKAR K MANDAL VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED]
SAMARENDRA DAS VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. JOHRI MAL [REFERRED]
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA VS. BHANU LODH [REFERRED]
MALIK MAZHAR SULTAN VS. U P PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [REFERRED]
MUBARAK MAZDOOR VS. K K BANERJI [REFERRED]
S NAGANNA VS. KRISHNA MURTHY [REFERRED]
MALLIKARJUNA SHARMA VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED]
Behariji Dass, Civil and Sessions Judge, Sultanpur and others VS. Chandra Mohan, Civil and Sessions Judge, Fatehpur, and others [REFERRED]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) All these writ petitions arise out of advertisement dated 31.3.2007 published by Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for direct recruitment in UP. Higher Judicial Service 2007. Since pleadings in most of these cases have been exchanged, as requested by learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petitions have been heard at the stage of admission under the Rules of the Court and are being finally decided by this common judgment.

(2.) In this bunch of writ petitions, there are two sets of cases. The first set of the writ petitions assail the validity of Rule 5(a) (old) and now 5(c), and Rule 12 of U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as "1975 Rules;while the other set of cases have been filed by persons who are presently working as Assistant Public Prosecutors/Assistant Prosecuting Officers , seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to allow them to appear in the aforesaid selection.

(3.) Before coming to the rival submissions, it would be appropriate to have a bird eye view, of the brief facts in various writ petitions.

Click here to view full judgment.

SANJAY AGRWAL Vs. STATE OF UP

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address