SURENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Shireesh Kumar, learned Counsel for the Peti tioner and Mr. Ashok Shukla, learned Standing Counsel.

(2.) WITH the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of 3t the admission stage itself.

(3.) IN the instant case, on the basts of the instructions received by the learned Standing Counsel, it has been stated that the proposed final order for punishment has already been passed by the State Government but the matter is pending before the Commission for its advice/consultation. It is not known to the learned Standing Counsel as to when the order was forwarded to the Commission but the fact remains that the enquiry proceedings are held up, because the matter is pending before the Commission at present. This situation cannot be appreciated.