(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard Counsel for the parties and perused the record.
(2.) THIS writ petition is directed against impugned orders dated 9-12-2005 passed by the Prescribed Authority and 11-12-2006 passed by the appellate Court. Both the Courts below have recorded concurrent finding of fact that need of the landlord for the accommodation in dispute under the tenancy of the petitioners is bona fide and genuine and his comparative hardship is greater than the tenants.
(3.) THE premises in dispute was taken on rent by Sri Ramesh Chandra Gupta, the husband of Smt. Kastoori Devi, petitioner No. 1. She claims that she is living in the accommodation in dispute with her two sons- Sri Dilip Kumar Gupta and Sri Pradeep Kumar Gupta, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in the present writ petition.