RAJ MANI PANDEY Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. K. Roopanwal, J. Heard Mr. Rama Nand Pandey for the revisionist and perused the record.

(2.) I do not think it proper to issue notice to the opposite sides as the order passed by the revisional Court is purely erroneous and if notices are issued, it would simply mean that illegality has been allowed to perpetuate by the High Court also.

(3.) IN view of the above, I find that the order impugned in this revision is an illegal order, which is liable to be set aside.