MAHESH CHANDRA Vs. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE ETAWAH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.

(2.) THIS writ petition is directed against the judgment and decree dated 5. 5. 2007 in SCC Revision No. 7 of 2004, Mahesh Chandra v. Dinesh Kumar Porwal and another, passed by Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court ando. 1, Etawah, as well as the judgment and decree dated 6. 5. 2004 in S. C. C. Suit No. 19 of 1994, Dinesh Kumar Porwal v. Mahesh Chandra, passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Etawah.

(3.) THE petitioner tenant contested the case by filing his written statement inter alia denying any service of notice as will as default in payment of rent. THE case of the petitioner was that respondent No. 3, had neither given any notice/ information in respect of purchase of the shop in dispute nor had given any notice under Section 20 (2) of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, read with Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, for termination of his tenancy from the said shop.