CHANDRA SHEIKHAR PATHSARIA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. K. Mahajan, J. This order will dispose of the above two writ petitions as common question of facts and law is involved in these petitions.

(2.) THE petitioner has sought a direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 30-9-1992 (Annexure- 3 to the writ petition) received by the petitioner on 15-10-1992 passed by respondent No. 3 which relates to the cancellation of mining lease under Rule 29 of the U. P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 as it did not carry out the condition stipulated in that rule.

(3.) THE respondents in the counter-affidavit have alleged that the petitioner did not comply with the provision of Rule 29 and the lease deed was cancelled on 30-9-1992.