MRIDUL KUMAR CHATURVEDI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner really prays to quash an intimation vide letter P. I. R.-2/p. R. O.-433/91-92, dated July 15, 1991 of the Commissioner-cum-Administrator, Ram Ganga Command Project, 3a/101, Azad Nagar, Kanpur-2 (Respon dent No. 2) intimating him that according to G. O. No. 15m/54-1-1-9/154/86, dated 11-7-1991, copy attached, he is being informed that his services have been terminated with effect from 28-2-1981. For the reasons be known to the petitioner he has not ap pended the G. O. aforementioned.

(2.) THE petitioner has come up with a case that his appointment cannot be ter minated retrospectively and thus is wholly inconceived and liable to be quashed ; that his request for regularisation has been duly forwarded by Respondent No. 2 and thus he be allowed to continue against the post in question till regularisation takes place; that the impugned order has been passed mala fide due to political pressure by the respon dents. THE petitioner has come up with a further case that since he has completed more than 9 months service it will not be proper to terminate this services.

(3.) IN the rejoinder affidavit, which has been filed today after serving its copy on the learned standing counsel also today, it has been stated, inter alia, that after the removal termination of Kaushal Hari Narain till today no one has been appointed regularly; that after his reinstatement Kaushal Hari Narain was transferred by the State Govern ment to Sharda Sahayak Command in Sep tember, 1995; that thereafter the petitioner filed a representation on 27-3-1996 the fate of which has not yet been communicated to the petitioner who is still discharging his duties and accordingly the writ petition is liable to be allowed and interim order con firmed.