SHRIKANT Vs. STATE OF U.P.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition is directed against the order dated 27.9.1996 dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner. The Prescribed Authority, by order dated 19.2.1976 declared the disputed plot as surplus land treating it to be the holding of Indra Dev. The petitioner filed appeal against the said order on 20.9.1995 along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. It appears that the petitioner filed photostat copies of certain documents. The Government counsel objected to the filing of the photostat copies. Respondent No. 1 dismissed the appeal on the ground that photostat copies were inadmissible in evidence. It was further observed that the counsel for the petitioner had not submitted written or oral arguments inspite of repeatedly time being granted to him. This order has been challenged in the present writ petition.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner urged that photostat copies of the documents were admissible in evidence. The provisions of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 were not applicable while adjudicating the dispute by the ceiling authorities under the provisions of U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960 (in short the Act). Section 37 of the Act provides the procedures to be followed by the ceiling authorities. It reads as under: - -

(3.) FROM reading of these two provisions it is clear that while adjudicating any dispute the prescribed authority or the appellate court exercises the powers of a court. It has to decide the dispute judicially. Section 1 of the Evidence Act provides that the Act shall apply to all judicial proceedings in or before any court.