VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Vs. MEENA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Sri A. N. Tripathi and Sri S. C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant.

(2.) THE present civil revision has been filed against the order of the Family Court, Jhansi dated 5.4.1996 under Section 115, C.P.C. By the impugned order, the Family Court has awarded a sum of Rs. 300 for maintenance from the date of the application and Rs. 1,500 towards litigation expenses under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act to the wife. This revision has been moved by the husband.

(3.) THE present revision has been filed under Section 115, C.P.C. proviso added by Act of 1976 to C.P.C. under Section 115 mandates that the High Court shall not interfere in any order passed during the pendency of the suit or proceedings unless the order finally disposes of the suit or other proceedings, or the order, if allowed to stand, would occasion a failure of justice or cause irreparable injury to the party against whom it was made.