AWADH NATH Vs. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY GORAKHPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. H. Zaidi, J. Heard learned Coun sel for the petitioners.

(2.) PRESENT petition has been filed chal lenging the validity of the order dt 8-7-1996 whereby the application filed by the petitioners for framing and deciding issue on the question of relationship between La ndlord and tenant as preliminary issue, has been rejected by the Prescribed Authority.

(3.) THE proceedings under the Act, as it is evident from various provisions con tained in the Act and the rules framed there under, are to be decided expeditiously. If various issues of law or fact are taken up separately and are decided by the Prescribed Authority separately, that will give handle to the party who is interested in delaying the disposal of the proceeding/case by challeng ing the validity of the said orders, before the revisional/appellate authorities constituted under the Act, before this Court, or even before the Supreme Court. By deciding the issues/questions involved in the case in piece meal, in that event the object of the Act, shall be frustrated.