REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

MOHAN SINGH Appellant

V/S

DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UTTAR KASHI Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

MOHAMMED SHAMAHAD ALI AND OTHER V. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
UMESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA V,DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,GORAKHPUR [REFERRED TO]
J. AND K. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ETC. V. DR. NARINDER MOHAN AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
GRAHAK SANSTHA MANCH ANA OTHERS V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION VS. BALWANT REGULAR MOTOR SERVICE AMRAVATI [REFERRED TO]
BASAVANTAPPA VS. GANGADHAR NARAYAN DHARWADKAR [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEERUT VS. PISTA DEVI:PISTA DEVI [REFERRED TO]
K KRISHNA REDDY SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION UNIT II LMD KARIM NAGAR ANDHRA PRADESH VS. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION UNIT II LMD KARIM NAGAR ANDHRA PRADESH:K KRISHNA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
SUSHMA GOSAIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
BANWASI SEVA ASHRAM VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT U P VS. PUSHPA SRIVASTAVA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH K L SHARMA R D GUPTA ARUN KUMAR MISHRA VS. U P STATE LAW OFFICERS ASSOCIATION :U P STATE LAW OFFICERS ASSOCIATION HIGH COURT ALLAHABAD :STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH:STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
CALCUTTA PORT TRUST CALCUTTA PORT TRUST CALCUTTA PORT TRUST CALCUTTA PORT TRUST CALCUTTA PORT TRUST CALCUTTA PORT TRUST VS. DEBA PROSAD BAG:SATYA RANJAN KUTTY:MARADHAN JANA:SACHINDRA NATH MAITY:AKSHOY KUMAR GIRI:ASMOKE KUMAR NAITY [REFERRED TO]
UMESH KUMAR NAGPAL ANIL MALIK VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. NARESH KUMAR BALI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. S K SINHA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF GUJARAT VS. DAYA SHAMJI BHAI [REFERRED TO]
B C CHATURVEDI UNION OF INDIA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
JAGDISH PRASAD VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. NARESH TANWAR [REFERRED TO]
ISHWARLAL PREMCHAND SHAH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
BIBI SAYEEDA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
KRISHNA CHANDRA PALLAI VS. UNION OF INDIA FB [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) B. S. Chauhan, J. In all these writ petitions a common question of law is involved and thus all the writ petitions are disposed of by a common judgment.

(2.) THE factual gamut of these cases reveal that the petitioners' agricultural land was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. (hereinafter called 'the Act ). On 23. 12. 1968 and declaration under Section 6 was made on 31. 3. 1971. Before making the award, possession of the said land was taken by resorting to the provisions of Section 17 (1) of the Act in 1971-1972. Instead of making an award under Section 11 (1) of the Act, an agreement was arrived at between the parties in the year 1978 under the provisions of Section 11 (2) of the Act.

(3.) COUNTER affidavits and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged by the learned counsel for the parties.

Click here to view full judgment.

MOHAN SINGH Vs. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE UTTAR KASHI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address