RAM NARESH Vs. D D C PADARAUNA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. B. Mehrotra, J. The petitioners claimed that on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties in the court of Assistant Consolidation Officer in Case No. 776, the Assistant Consolidation Officer vide his order, dated 14-11-1987 directed that the name of the petitioners be mutated over plot No. 684 area 22 decimal in village, Pakar and at Chak No. 116 area 45 decimal at village, Bartha in place of Gangajali.

(2.) AGGRIEVED thereby an appeal has been filed by the respondents wherein an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was also moved by the respondents for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. The petitioners filed objection against the application filed by the respondents under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and contended that the appeal is not maintainable and also contended before the Assistant Settlement Officer, Consolidation that at first, the issue of limitation in filing the appeal, should be heard and decided.

(3.) AGGRIEVED by the aforesaid two orders, the petitioners have filed the present writ petition.