CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I. P. Vasisth, J. The petitioner prays for a writ of certiorari quashing the charge-sheet contained in Annexure 6 along with the consequent proceedings and a writ of mandamus commanding upon the respon dents to release his full pension, gratuity, G. P. F. and other retiral dues.

(2.) AFTER putting in about three decades of service in the State Police Department, ihe petiiioner retired from the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police on 31-10-1990 on attaining the normal age of super annuation (58 years ). It was pleaded that during his active service, vide their orders dated 10-8- 1978 contained in Annexure 1 attac. icd with the petition, the departmen tal authorities conveyed the following ad verse remarks to him for the year 1977-78: a___"but supervision over subordinate staff was not'effective. " b. "he occupied office flat for residential purpose for which rent was paid by the Govern ment and he also charged house rent from the Government which casts adverse reflection on his integrity. "