BRIJ KISHORE Vs. COLLECTOR JHANSI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a writ petition in which the Court is not inclined to interfere with the order of the Collector, Jhansi dated 11 November, 1983, ap pended as Annexure *5' to the writ petition.

(2.) THE order was rendered in Case No. 9 of 1982-83 in the matter of State v. Brij Kishore, of matters under Section 122-C of the Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950.

(3.) THE less the High Court comments on the conduct of the petitioner as an Advocate, the better it would be for him, suffice it to say, that the conduct of the petitioner is unbecoming that of a lawyer or an Advocate. He has misrepresented facts to procure a favour from the State, to which he was otherwise not entitled. THE petitioner has further misutilised the equity jurisdiction of the High Court in seeking a writ of certiorari by contending that the order of the Collector, Jhansi, is incorrect. In fact it is the other way round as the petitioner is not entitled to any indulgence from the High Court and equity is against him.