BAL KRISHNA SINHA Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARING of the arguments of Sri Sudhakar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, began in the pre- lunch sitting of the Court. Further hearing of his arguments was to be resumed in the post lunch sitting of the Court. Even after the laps of the period of about 50 minutes, Sri Sudhakar Pandey is not available to resume his arguments. The court is left to no choice except to presume that he does not want to make any further submission. Sri R. C. Yadav, learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents, has been heard.

(2.) THE petitioner, who was appointed officiating Survey Naib-Tehsildar by means of the order dated 24th February, 1979, a copy whereof is Annexure '3' to the petition, prays for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to promote him on the post of Tehsildar and to provide all the benefits of the said post for which he was entitled.

(3.) IN the circumstances, the Court is clearly of the opinion that the petitioner has no legally cognizable and judicially enforceable right to be promoted on the post of Tehsildar as claimed by him.