RAM SAMUJ Vs. D D C JAUNPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. P. Srivastava, J. Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation dismissing the revision of Ram Samuj, the petitioner, upholding the order passed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) in appeal whereunder plot No. 128 having a total area of 6 decimals had been ordered to be taken out of the consolidation scheme, the petitioner has now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the appellate as well as revisional court order. During the pendency of the writ petition, learned counsel for the respondents had filed a supplementary affidavit annexing therewith the certified copy of the relevant chak map showing the position of plot No. 128 in dispute which has now been renumbered as plot No. 218.

(2.) I have heard Sri S. N. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. N. Singh, learned Counsel representing the contesting respondent No. 3 and have perused the record.

(3.) THE order of the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) was upheld by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in revision. In his order of affirmance the Deputy Director of Consolidation endorsed the view of the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) that considering the situation of the plot in dispute it would not be proper to keep it within the consolidation scheme. It was also noticed that in the remarks column of the Khasra the plot in dispute had been shown to be Parti Kadeem and in this view of the matter it was not possible to fix its valuation.