(1.) PARITOSH K. Mukherjee, J. In the present writ petition, the petitioner who was a clerk, has challenged the impugned order of termination, dated 28-10-1992, passed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Mainpuri, being respondent No. 2, set out at Annexure 5 to the writ petition.
(2.) IT appears from the aforesaid impugned communication that the services of the petitioner was terminated as the petitioner was temporary incumbent in the post,
(3.) THE respondent No. 2 made an endorsement on the application of the petitioner on 1-5-1992 directing the second clerk to submit a detailed report as is evident from the endorsement on the application.