(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 14.8.96, Annexure-2 to the petition and for a mandamus directing respondents not to take any action in pursuance of the order dated 14.8.96.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
(3.) SRI Khare then contended that the respondent No. 4 was not fit to be appointed as Principal because he had interpolated the service book by changing the date from 8.7.71 to 6.7.70. In my opinion, the audit report cannot use against petitioner because if there was any such allegation, he should have been charge-sheeted and given an opportunity of hearing. Since that was not done, I cannot accept this contention.