MITHLESH Vs. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE JANSATH MUZAFFARNAGAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) M. Katju, J. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned order of re-counting dated 22. 3. 1996.

(2.) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was elected as Pradhan of Gram Sabha Pamnauli. An election petition was filed against her which is pend ing. The impugned order of re- counting has been passed during the pendency of the election petition.

(3.) IN my opinion this is not the proper approbation According by the order of re counting is set aside and I direct the respon dent No. 1 to pas:- a fresh order within one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him in the light of the observations made above after hearing the parties con cerned. The petition is disposed of accord ingly. Petition allowed .