TEJ PAL Vs. XXIIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondents.

(2.) PRESENT petition arises out of the proceedings under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, for short the Act.

(3.) THE Prescribed Authority after recording the findings on the relevant issues against respondent No. 3 rejected the application for release on behalf of respondent No. 3; but the need of respondent No. 4 was found to be genuine and bona fide. The finding on the question of hardship was also recorded in favour of respondent No. 4, and the portion of the house which was given to him under the will, was directed to be released in his favour by the Prescribed Authority.