SHEEL DEVI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned standing counsel representing the respondents.

(2.) PERUSED the record.

(3.) THE petitioners thereafter moved an application on 18.9.1985 seeking recall of the order dated 25.1.1976. In the affidavit filed in support of the aforesaid application, it was asserted that Hublal had executed a sale-deed in respect of his half share in the land in dispute vide the sale-deed dated 21.2.1972 in favour of Smt. Dev Kali, Smt. Shyam Kali, Smt. Ram Rati, Smt. Sheela Devi and Smt. Jubraji wife of Shiv Kumar and had delivered possession to the transferees who were continuing to be in exclusive possession over the same. It was asserted that Hublal had no right, title or interest left in the land in dispute and the holdings belonging to the objectors had been declared to be surplus treating the same to be belonging to Hublal. It was asserted that the objectors came to know of the order declaring the land in dispute as surplus on 1.9.1983. THE true copies of the aforesaid applications filed by Smt. Sheela Devi and Smt. Sukhraji have been annexed as Annexures 4 and 5 to the writ petition, along with the copies of the affidavits filed in support thereof.