HARI PRASAD YADAV Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) D. S. Sinha, J. Heard Sri N. P. Pandey, learned counsel for the peti tioner and Sri A. K. Gupta, learned Addl. Standing Counsel of the Central Government, representing the respondents.

(2.) THE petitioner was serving in the Indian Army and retired in the year 1983. After his retirement the petitioner secured employment in Regimental Canteen, C. O. D. , Chheoki at Allahabad.

(3.) THE Tribunal found, as a matter of fact, that the petitioner was a canteen employee ; and that he was not a servant of Union Government. THErefore, it rejected the petition of the petitioner at the admission stage itself by its order dated 3rd January, 1991 holding that it had no jurisdiction to entertain and adjudicate upon the controversy.