KEDAR Vs. SHYAMA DEVI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A. B. Srivastava, J. Heard.

(2.) IN this writ petition, there is short question of law. Both sides learned counsel agree that the petition itself may be dis posed of finally thus they have been heard.

(3.) ACCORDINGLY the writ petition is al lowed. The impugned orders of the respon dents 3 to 5 are quashed. The proceedings before the respondent No. 6 in revenue suit No, 22 of 1984-85 under Section 229b/176 Z. A & L. R. Act shall remain stayed during the pendency of the appeal arising out of the judgment of the trial court in Civil Suit No. 261 of 1982 of the Court of Munsif Budaun which appeal is now pending before the District Judge Budaun. Learned District Judge is directed to dispose of himself, or in case he has made over the appeal to any other court to ensure that the same is finally disposed of within four months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented before him. Parties shall not be allowed to delay by seeking adjournment. The order of proceedings shall stand va cated, on expiry of four months period.