DUBEY CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY Vs. COLLECTOR HARIDWAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PALOK Basu, J. The judgment prepared by my esteemed Brother Hon'ble R. K. Mahajan, J. has been read. While agreeing with the conclusion that the writ petition should be dismissed it is desirable to mention few reasons for the same.

(2.) FACTS and the questions involved as to the recovery proceedings have already been narrated in the judgment of Hon'ble R. K. Mahajan, J. and are thus not repeated here.

(3.) AS is, therefore, obvious the petitioner did not complete the work con tracted and has beenprima facie justifiably charged with removal of machinery, materials and other articles of the depart ment. The recovery proceedings therefore, are valid on facts.