RAVINDRA AND CO Vs. CEGAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner challenges an order dated 16-7-1996, copy of which is Annexure '7' to the writ petition. The said order reads as under :

(2.) I have heard Sri Somesh Khare holding brief from Sri Ashok Khare, Counsel for the petitioner.

(3.) An order has been passed by the Asstt. Collector, Central Excise determining under that item the petitioner's products shall be subjected to Central Excise and ordering the determination of the amount payable by the petitioner. Against the said order the petitioner preferred an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise which was dismissed by order dated 14-3-1996, against which the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi. In that appeal an application praying for staying the operation of the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise dated 14-3-1996 was made. It is that application that has been dismissed by the impugned order reproduced above.