HANIFUR RAHMAN KHAN Vs. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAMPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner was denied a contract, a Government con tract by the department of police, Uttar Pradesh. THE immediate cause of filing the petition was a communication from the Su perintendent of police, Rampur, dated 9 January, 1994, intimating the petitioner that a certain contract has been denied to him. THE cause given is that the petitioner has been placed in the black list.

(2.) THE petitioner explains the situation before the Court that he had at one stage being charged under Section 9 of the Opium Act, 1878 and convicted by the Excise Magistrate. This is the order of the Excise Magistrate-I, Rampur, dated 13 October, 1960. THE petitioner filed an appeal before the Sessions Judge, Rampur. This was ap peal No. 164 of 1960 Shakhawat All Khan and others v. State. THE appeal was decided by the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Rampur, dated 18 November, 1960. THE ap pellants were acquitted.

(3.) THE Court is afraid that the reliefs which the petitioner seeks cannot be granted.