JUMMAN BAKSH Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 13-10-1986 passed by Additional Sessions Judge Ghaziabad in Criminal Appeal No. 225 of 1985 dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and order of the Special judicial Magistrate First Class Hapur dated 4-11-1985, convicting the applicant under section 7/16 P. F. Act to six months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000/-.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the applicant has pressed this revision firstly that the Trial Court did not give opportunity to the defence to cross examine the witnesses after the charges were refrained.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the applicant has also Contended that no public witness has been examined by the prosecution to prove its case. Both the courts have relied upon the evidence of witnesses, that were produced for prosecution and have recorded concurrent finding of facts which can not be termed as perverse.