MEWA RAM AND ORS. Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) One Puttu Lal was convicted Under Sec. 148 while his 16 companions were convicted under Sec. 147 IPC. The Magistrate gave the benefit of Sec. 4 of the UP First Offenders' Probation Act to them on condition that each of them shall execute a personal bond of Rs. 500 with a surety in the like amount. The accused persons executed personal bonds as well as surety bonds as directed. However, as the bonds were unstamped the accused were directed to affix necessary fee payable on them and the Magistrate passed the following order:

(2.) The Applicants filed a revision challenging the legality of the magistrate's order and the learned Sessions Judge thereupon made the above reference to this Court recommending that the order of the Magistrate be quashed.

(3.) On behalf of the State reliance was placed on Article 6 of Schedule II of the UP Court Fees Act which prescribes fee payable on bonds and other instruments of obligation given in pursuance of an order made by a court of magistrate under any Sec. of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 or the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and not otherwise provided for by this Act. It will be noticed that this Article has no application to bonds executed under the UP First Offenders Act. In this connection support was sought to be derived from Sec. 8 of the UP First Offenders Probation Act, 1938 which reads as follows: