LAWS(ALL)-2026-1-92

BABU KHAN Vs. COMMISSIONER ADMN.LUCKNOW

Decided On January 29, 2026
BABU KHAN Appellant
V/S
Commissioner Admn.Lucknow Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Aftab Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.P. Maurya, learned Additional CSC for the respondent - State.

(2.) The present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dtd. 18/7/1998 passed by respondent No.1 and order dtd. 29/5/1997 passed by respondent No.2 and notice viz. From-III part C contained as annexures 1 to 3 to the writ petition.

(3.) Factual matrix of the case is that a notice under Sec. 10(2) / CLH Form 3-C was issued to the deceased petitioner on 29/2/1996 mentioning therein 15.65 Acres of irrigated land as ceiling surplus. In the said notice the holdings of the deceased petitioner of Village Barethi, Tahsil Gola, District Kheri was mentioned.