RAM SANEHI Vs. D.D.C.AND OTHERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel as well as Jai Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party and perused the record.

(2.) Facts in brief of the present case are that before Deputy Director of Consolidation, in a proceeding under Section 48 (2) of U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, two revisions, namely, Revision Nos.152/228/408 and 935 were filed, allowed by order dated 01.10.1993, the said authority has allowed the revisions and thereafter the chaks in pursuance to the said order have been altered between Badri and Ram Sanehi/petitioner. As during the intervening period from the date of passing of the order dated 01.10.1993 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Hardoi and filing of the present writ petition challenging the same, Badri died. So his sons, namely, Ram Shanker and Ghasi Ram have been impleaded as opposite party nos.2 and 3 by the petitioner while challenging the order dated 01.10.1993 in the instant matter.

(3.) On 24.02.2012, this Court has passed an order reads as under : -