REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

BABU Appellant

V/S

State of U.P. and Ors. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS VS. NARATA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
JAI PRAKASH VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
JASWANT SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN KUNJI RAMAN VS. KUNJI RAMAN:STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VS. JAGIWAN RAM [REFERRED TO]
BOARD OF REVENUE VS. PRASIDH NARAIN UPADHYAY MAHESH UPADHAYA [REFERRED TO]
BANSH GOPAL VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
PAWAN KUMAR YADAV VS. STATE OF UP [REFERRED TO]
KESAR CHAND VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
Chhedi Ram Maurya VS. Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board, Allahabad and others [REFERRED TO]
BHUNESHWAR RAI VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. VS. RAM NAGINA LAL SRIVASTAVA [REFERRED TO]
NAVRANG LAL SRIVASTAVA VS. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. VS. SRI RAM [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This reference has been placed before the Full Bench consequent to a learned Single Judge forming the opinion that a "serious conflict" existed between three Division Bench decisions of the Court. The issue arises with reference to the provisions of Regulation 370 of the Civil Services Regulations as applicable in the State of U.P. The issue is whether the period of service rendered as a work charged or a daily wage employee is liable to be counted for the purposes of computing "qualifying service" as required by Regulation 370 for the grant of pension. The judgments rendered by the Division Benches of the Court, which were noticed by the learned Single Judge, were:

(2.) A. STATUS OF A WORK CHARGED EMPLOYEE

(3.) Jaswant Singh and the principles laid down therein came to be reiterated by the Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan Vs. Kunji Raman, 1997 2 SCC 517. Their Lordships held:

Click here to view full judgment.

BABU Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address