REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Ram Lakhan Prajapati Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

INDIA GENERAL NAVIGATION AND RLY. CO. LTD. V. ITS EMPLOYEES [REFERRED TO]
P. C. THOMAS V. MUTHOLI CO -OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. [REFERRED TO]
M.L. BOSE V. ITS EMPLOYEES [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY KANT KHARE V. U.P. COOPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORIES FEDERATION LTD. [REFERRED TO]
P.C. THOMAS V. MUTHOLI COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK LIMITED ALL INDIA PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION VS. ALL INDIA PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION:PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
MEENGLAS TEA ESTATE VS. WORKMEN [REFERRED TO]
KESORAM COTTON MILLS LIMITED VS. GANGADHAR [REFERRED TO]
KESORAM COTTON MILLS LIMITED VS. GANGADHAR [REFERRED TO]
SUR ENAMEL AND STAMPING WORLD LIMITED VS. WORKMEN [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. C S SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
EMPLOYERS OF FIRESTONE TYRE AND RUBBER CO PRIVATE LIMITED VS. WORKMEN [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA VS. PRAKASH CHAND JAIN [REFERRED TO]
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS. D C AGGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
S C GIROTRA VS. UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK UCO BANK [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMMAD QUARAMUDDIN VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
HARDWARI LAL VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL VS. KHARAK SINGH [REFERRED TO]
S D SHARMA VS. TRADE FAIR AUTHORITY OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
CENTRAL RAILWAY VS. RAGHUBIR SARAN [REFERRED TO]
DINA NATH CHAUBE VS. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
VYSYA BANK LTD VS. M NAMADEVA PAI [REFERRED TO]
ANAND G JOSHI VS. MAHARASHTRA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT SUGAR MILLS LIMITED VS. JAI SINGH [REFERRED TO]
TATA OIL MILLS COMPANY, LIMITED VS. ITS WORKMEN [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri Ajay Bhanot, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Shiv Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri H.C. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

(2.) Ram Lakhan Prajapati is before this Court for quashing the orders dated 29.10.2009, 26.3.2010 and 1.7.2010. He has further prayed for direction commanding the respondents not to deduct/reduce his salary and to pay his regular salary alongwith increments.

(3.) As per record, this much is reflected that the petitioner was initially appointed as a Constable in Civil Police on 1.2.1978. A preliminary enquiry was initiated against him on 28.12.2008 on the allegation that the petitioner was found drunken at a motor stand in District Jhansi on 26.12.2008, and in the aforesaid preliminary enquiry, the petitioner was found guilty. He was suspended in pursuance of the aforesaid preliminary enquiry dated 28.12.2008. Thereafter, on 10.2.2009 a departmental enquiry was ordered against him under Rule 14 (1) of U.P. Police Officers of Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 and the charge sheet dated 24.3.2009 was served upon the petitioner. The enquiry officer submitted his enquiry report on 30.3.2009 indicting the petitioner. Thereafter a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 5.5.2009 to which he submitted his reply on 26.2.2009. By the impugned order dated 29.10.2009, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jhansi imposed a major penalty upon the petitioner by which the petitioner was reduced to the lowest pay scale for a period of three years. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the appellate authority on 18.11.2009 and the said appeal was dismissed on 26.3.2010. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred a revision before the revisional authority and the revision was dismissed on 1.7.2010

Click here to view full judgment.

RAM LAKHAN PRAJAPATI Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address