REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Jal Sansthan,Agra Appellant

V/S

Smt. Krishna Kumari Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

GREGG VS. BROMLEY [REFERRED TO]
ELLIS VS. TORRINGTON [REFERRED TO]
U.P.AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD VS. KANAK AND OTHERS [REFERRED TO]
AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
JAGANNATH MARWARI VS. KALIDAS RAHA [REFERRED TO]
JAI NARAIN PANDEY VS. KISHUN DUTT MISSIR [REFERRED TO]
PANDIT LAKSHMI KANT JHA VS. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX BIHAR AND ORISSA [REFERRED TO]
KHORSHED SHAPOOR CHENAI VS. ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY ANDHRA PRADESH ANT [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEERUT VS. PISTA DEVI:PISTA DEVI [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. SHIVKUMAR BHARGAVA [REFERRED TO]
GIAN CHAND VS. GOPALA [REFERRED TO]
LAXMI ENGINEERING WORKS VS. RS G INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTE [REFERRED TO]
MAHAVIR VS. RURAL INSTITUTE AMRAVATI [REFERRED TO]
SNEH PRABHA VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
U P JAL NIGAM LUCKNOW VS. KALRA PROPERTIES P LTD [REFERRED TO]
AJAY KRISHAN SHINGHAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STAR WIRE INDIA LIMITED VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
MEERA SAHNI VS. LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
MANMATHA NATH MULLICK VS. SHEIKH HEDAIT ALI [REFERRED TO]
SRI SRI ISWAR GOPAL JEW VS. GLOBE THEATRES LTD [REFERRED TO]
BASANTA KUMAR DAS VS. NAGENDRA NATH PAL [REFERRED TO]
GANGA DIN VS. PIYARE [REFERRED TO]
RAM DAYAL VS. MUKAT MANOHAR [REFERRED TO]
MOTI LAL VS. RADHEY LAL [REFERRED TO]
V CHANDRASEKARAN VS. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER [REFERRED TO]
RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT VS. SUBHASH SINDHI COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY [REFERRED TO]
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA VS. KAILASH CHAND [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Shri P.C. Jain, learned counsel for appellant. None appeared on behalf of respondent although this appeal has been called in revised. Hence, we proceed to decide appeal exparte.

(2.) This appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as "Act 1894") has arisen from award/judgment dated 30.07.2002 passed by Sri Musharraf Husain, 13th Additional District Judge, Agra, adjudicating Land Acquisition Reference (hereinafter referred to as "LAR") No.203 of 1993, determining market value of acquired land at the rate of Rs.1,56,000/ per bigha (Rs.51.57 per square yard). Court below has also directed that claimantrespondents shall be entitled for payment of solatium at the rate of 30% of market value, 12% additional compensation and interest for various periods, as per provisions of Act, 1894.

(3.) At the instance of Jal Sansthan, Agra (hereinafter referred to as "appellant"), proceedings for acquisition of 80 bighas, 4 biswa and 15 biswansi land in VillageBaipur Muslim, Tehsil and DistrictAgra for construction of a new Water Works were initiated by State Government by publishing a notification under Section 4 (1) of Act, 1894 on 24.10.1988. Notification under Section 6 (1) was published on 24.6.1989. Possession of acquired land was taken on 16.08.1990. Special Land Acquisition Officer (hereinafter referred to as "SLAO") made award on 9.8.1991 determining market value of acquired land at the rate of Rs.36666.67 per bigha (i.e. Rs.12.12 per square yard), besides 30% solatium, 12% additional compensation and interest at the rate of 9% from the date of compensation till one year, thereafter, at the rate of 15% till actual payment is made.

Click here to view full judgment.

JAL SANSTHAN,AGRA Vs. SMT. KRISHNA KUMARI

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address