REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Brajendra Kumar Gupta Appellant

V/S

STATE OF U.P. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE NORTH WALES POLICE V. EVANS [REFERRED TO]
P.K. PRADHAN VS. STATE OF SIKKIM [REFERRED TO]
ANUPAM SINGH VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KISHORE ROY VS. KAMLESHWAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
A K KRAIPAK VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. RENUSAGAR POWER CO [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. MAHARAJA DHARMANDER PRASAD SINGH:MAHARANI RAJLAXMI KUMARI DEVI [REFERRED TO]
G B MAHAJAN VS. JALGAON MUNICIPAL COUNCIL [REFERRED TO]
U P FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS. GEM CAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
OM KUMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED VS. AJAY KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
RAGHUNATH ANANT GOVILKAR VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY VS. MANMOHAN SINGH [REFERRED TO]
OM PRAKASH VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH C.B.I. VS. MAHESH G. JAIN [REFERRED TO]
MANOHAR LAL SHARMA VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY [REFERRED TO]
CHANDAN KUMAR BASU VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
URMILA DEVI VS. YUDHVIR SINGH [REFERRED TO]
SANJAYSINH RAMRAO CHAVAN VS. DATTATRAY GULABRAO PHALKE [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard Sri Amit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Imran Ullah, learned Additional Advocate General, learned counsel for CBI Sri N.I. Jafri, respondent no.3 as well as Sri Navin Sinha, Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Shwetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4.

(2.) The instant petition has been filed with a prayer to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.11.2014 passed by Principal Secretary (Home), U.P. Government at Lucknow, respondent no.2 (hereinafter referred to as the Sanctioning Authority) whereby the sanction to prosecute the respondent no.4 Sri J. Ravindra Gaur, Senior Superintendent of Police, Aligarh has been refused in Case Crime No.571 of 2008 (Now Case Crime No.R.C. -053201050006), under Sections 302,201,120 -B IPC, police station CBI/SCB, Lucknow.

(3.) Further prayed to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent nos.1 and 2 to accord sanction for the prosecution of the respondent no.4 in the above noted case.

Click here to view full judgment.

BRAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address