(1.) RAKESH Tiwari, J. Heard Counsel for the petitioner, Sri P. K. Jain, Counsel for the respondents and perused the record.
(2.) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case are that S. C. C. Suit No. 135 of 1994 was filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 against the petitioner and one Sri Kallu Mal respondent No. 7 for their eviction from the shop, in dispute. It was alleged that the petitioner, who was tenant of the shop, in dispute, on a monthly rent of Rs. 100/- with house tax and water charge @ Rs. 20/- per month had inducted Sri Kallu Mal as sub- tenant and was not regularly making payment of rent to the landlords.
(3.) AGGRIEVED, the petitioner has come up before this Court by means of the instant writ petition.