ABID Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) R. C. Deepak, J. Heard Sri Ravindra Sharma, learned Counsel for the applicant-accused learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

(2.) THE first bail application having been dismissed in default, the applicant-accused has moved this second bail application for being released on bail in case crime No. 34 of 2005 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 120-B IPC and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act pertaining to Police Station Dhoomanganj, District Allahabad.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the State has on the other hand advanced his argument, but there is nothing substantial therein to ignore and over-look the fact that the name of the applicant-accused does not find place in the First Information Report, that his name has been disclosed for the first time by Umesh Pal who is not an eye-witness.