ARVIND KUMAR JAISWAL Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BARKAT Ali Zaidi, J. This is an application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. and the prayer is that the proceedings in the complaint in which the process has been issued against the applicant and others, be quashed.

(2.) OPP. Party No. 2 complainant Ram Kumar Verma, complainant filed a complaint against the applicant and two others before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, alleging that the accused- applicant is the Manager of a firm known as M/s Farma Associate and Distributor of M/s. Penjon Ltd. Dava Bazar Indore.

(3.) , 122319, 25-8-1998 , Rs. 1,990/- , Not supplied. Pursuant to order with regard to the amount of last three drafts, after much persuasion , accused No. 3 in connivance of accused Nos. 1 and 2 with an intention to commit to cheat the complainant, sent sub- standard goods and also, injurious for health and also did not also adjust the residual outstanding sums of the remaining drafts shown above, against which, short supply was don. The complainant demanded Rs. 9180/- from the accused persons with regard to the above outstanding money but the accused persons refused to oblige. 4. On these facts , the learned Magistrate issued summons against the accused under Section 420, I. P. C. , against which order, one of the accused-applicant has come to this Court by filing application under Section 482 Cr. P. C. 5. Heard Sri D. P. S. Chauhan, learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A. G. A. for the State.