RAJ PAL Vs. DY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION BULANDSHAHR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) S. N. Srivastava, J. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THIS writ petition is directed against the judgment and dated 8-3-2001 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bulandshahr by which four Revisions No. 206, Ram Prasad v. Tuki Ram, 257 Ram Prasad v. Raj Pal, 199 Tuki Ram v. Raj Pal and 2002 Dharm Dutt v. Sanjiv, were allowed and chaks were altered.

(3.) CONSIDERED the argument of the parties. It transpires from the impugned order that order does not contain any reason for reversal of the allotment made by Settlement Officer Consolidation on plot No. 156 which was the original holding of petitioner and was allotted itself alongwith tube-well.