RAMRATI Vs. STATE OF U P

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALLAH Raham, J. List revised. None respondes for the opposite party No. 2.

(2.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned A. G. A.

(3.) THE contention of the petitioners' Counsel is that there is no provision of review in the Act. THE learned Counsel for the petitioners has read out the provisions of the Act and the Rules from which it is clear that there is no provision of review either in the Act or in the Rules. Similarly, a revision is also not provided under Section 23 of the Act.